Wildberries is refused TM registration for its Violet Pantone 254C by Rospatent

On September 15, 2022 the IP Court dismissed a lawsuit by the Russian giant online marketplace Wildberries OOO, and upheld Rospatent refusal to register Pantone 254C as a color trademark.

In May 2020, Wildberries filed an application for registration of violet “Pantone 254C” color as a trademark with regards to services in class 35. However, the application was refused, and Appeal filed with RosPatent Chamber for Patent Disputes yielded no positive results. Rospatent has found the appealed designation to be not sufficiently distinctive to satisfy the trademark criteria and concluded that a color as such cannot be an object of registration.

To overcome this decision, Wildberries lawyers filed a lawsuit against Rospatent in the IP Court, stressing its long use of Pantone 254C violet, which, as has been confirmed by the poll results, has become associated for most of customers with the Wildberries marketplace. Further, none of the other marketplaces currently acting in Russia is using the same color as their trade dress, such as office furnishing and other commercial merchandise.

TM 758874 https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUTM&DocNumber=758874&TypeFile=html* all trademarks are property of their respective owners

The Court, however, has arrived at a conclusion that no distinctiveness for the color as such has been acquired through its use by Wildberries company. Most designations, actually used by the Claimant and referred to as the evidence, do have other elements, such as words, abbreviations and figures. Moreover, these designations mostly do not exactly have Pantone 254C color background. And there were quite a few other market players which use shades of violet for their Internet trade activities. The poll survey was conducted only after the application was filed and its results were, in fact, not so convincing to confirm that for majority of the customers the color was definitely associated with the Claimant. Therefore, the Court supported the Office and dismissed the lawsuit.

https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/71e7b0bd-5821-47a5-a058-04ff7379b4fe

* all trademarks are property of their respective owners

pat

Recent Posts

Russia modernizes IP law for software-implemented inventions: greater clarity for digital technologies from 2027

Russia is updating its intellectual property legislation to reflect the way modern digital technologies are…

3 недели ago

Eurasian Patent Term Extensions: Patentica’s Guide in The Patent Lawyer Magazine

Patentica is proud to announce that our Eurasian patent attorneys, Ekaterina Petrova and Victor Lisovenko,…

1 месяц ago

Pharmaceutical innovation in Eurasia: AstraZeneca registers a new medicine in Russia

AstraZeneca has registered Baxfendi (baxdrostat) in Russia for the treatment of arterial hypertension. The medicine…

1 месяц ago

EAPO joins the Hague System: what will change for applicants from October 10, 2026

On July 10, 2026, the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) acceded to the Geneva Act of…

2 месяца ago

Russia and Indonesia strengthen cooperation in intellectual property

Rospatent and Indonesia's Ministry of Law have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to expand…

4 месяца ago

Five years of the Eurasian system for the protection of industrial designs

In 2026, the Eurasian industrial design system marks its fifth anniversary. Over the past five…

5 месяцев ago