New Rules for Opposition procedure in Russia

By the joint Order of the Ministry of Science and High Education and Ministry of the Economic Development No.644/261, new Rules for Dispute Resolution of the Chamber for Patent Disputes of the Russian Patent and Trademark Office were introduced and came into force on the 6th of September 2020. The new rules has substantially changed the procedure to resolve appeals and oppositions submitted to the Chamber for Patent Disputes harmonizing the overall procedure with that applied by the Russian courts.

Legalizing the widely adopted unofficial practice of arranging for online meetings and hearings, partially due to continued COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, the Rules now formally allow parties to attend the proceedings via video conference calls. This shall only require a request from a respective participant two weeks before the hearing. Audio and video recordings of all hearings shall be available to all parties if requested within 4 months form the hearing.

All kinds of official correspondence, including notices of appeals and oppositions, requests, and responses may now be filed via the official RUTPO website by using a personal account. The official website information will include receipts of opposition filed and official notifications to participants shall contain necessary coded identifiers, allowing to access all case materials from their personal accounts.

Formality check of submitted documents shall be shortened from 1 month to just 5 business days. Upon payment of the official fee for opposition or appeal, the first hearing must be set within 1 month for appeals against the RUPTO’s decisions, and 2 months for other oppositions.

Possible postponements of hearings are now more specific and shortened. The board of examiners now may only postpone hearings for 1 month at most in case of additional questions or arguments presented by parties, or whether an opposition is accompanied by a significant number of documents. The same applies for a sudden sick leave of a member of the board. Hearing may be also postponed for no longer than 2 months due to participant’s motivated request and for no longer than 3 months if the board seeks for an independent expert’s opinion.

In contrast to the previous version of the Rules patent owners can now independently request the board to consider the amended claims during the procedure. Claims can be amended on the basis of application materials without broadening the patent scope before the opposition, which is supposed to provide patent owners more flexibility and freedom to keep patents in amended form. On the other hand, petitioners submitting oppositions may raise new grounds as a course of opposition procedure in response to patent proprietor’s line of arguments or suggested amendments.

To recap the new Rules substantially clarify the procedure at the Chamber for Patent Disputes making it more suitable and transparent for all participants and general public.

We at PATENTICA will be happy to answer any further questions you may have. Please feel free to contact us for more details at info@patentica.com.

pat

Recent Posts

Five years of the Eurasian system for the protection of industrial designs

In 2026, the Eurasian industrial design system marks its fifth anniversary. Over the past five…

2 недели ago

Sports industry sees strong growth in patents, trademarks and designs

On World Intellectual Property Day 2026, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) released new data…

3 недели ago

Patentica Partner Eduard Shablin Addresses IP Eurasia Seminar in China

Eduard Shablin, Partner at Patentica, participated in the second IP Eurasia mobile seminar held in…

1 месяц ago

Patentica at the INTA 2026 Annual Meeting in London

Patentica participated in the INTA 2026 Annual Meeting held from May 2 to May 6,…

1 месяц ago

Eurasian Patent System shows steady growth in 2025

In 2025, the Eurasian patent system demonstrated steady growth in applicant activity. The number of…

2 месяца ago

11 Million Ruble Compensation for the Jewelry Brand «TOUS»

The lawyers of Patentica have once again confirmed that infringement of intellectual property should not…

3 месяца ago